lÉÉäc÷Ò ¤É½þÖiÉ ½þ¨ÉÉ®úä {ÉÉºÉ ¨ÉäÆ Ê¶ÉEòɪÉiÉ +É ®ú½þÒ ½þè* BäºÉÉ ½þÖ+É lÉÉ ÊEò BEò ¤ÉÉ®ú +JɤÉÉ®ú ¨ÉäÆ ÊxÉEò±É MɪÉÉ lÉÉ ÊEò ®úÉ¨É Ê´É±ÉÉºÉ {ÉɺɴÉÉxÉ xÉä ¤É½þÖiÉ ½þÒ ®úä±´Éä {ÉÉºÉ EòÉ Ê¨ÉºÉªÉÚWÉ ÊEòªÉÉ ½þè +Éè®ú ¶ÉiÉɤnùÒ BEºÉ|ÉèºÉ ¨ÉäÆ +Éè®ú ®úÉVÉvÉÉxÉÒ BEºÉ|ÉèºÉ ¨ÉäÆ ¦ÉÒ ®úä±´Éä {ÉÉºÉ ¤É½þÖiÉ <¶ªÉÚ Eò®ú ÊnùªÉÉ* ½þ¨ÉEòÉä ¤É½þÖiÉ MÉÖººÉÉ +ɪÉÉ* ½þ¨É Eò¦ÉÒ Eò®úiÉä xɽþÒÆ ½þèÆ, VÉÉä Eò½þÒÆ-Eò½þÒÆ Ê®úxªÉÖ+±É ´ÉMÉè®ú½þ +ÉiÉÉ ½þè, =ºÉä Eò®ú ÊnùªÉÉ Eò®úiÉä ½þèÆ, ´É½þ ¦ÉÒ +É{É ±ÉÉäMÉ Eò®úÉiÉä ½þèÆ iÉÉä*
uÉ®úÉ VÉÉ®úÒ
¸ÉÒ ®úÉ¨É Ê´É±ÉÉºÉ {ÉɺɴÉÉxÉ VÉÉ®úÒ ½þ¨ÉxÉä BEò +Énùä¶É VÉÉ®úÒ Eò®ú ÊnùªÉÉ ÊEò ¶ÉiÉɤnùÒ +Éè®ú ®úÉVÉvÉÉxÉÒ BEºÉ|ÉäºÉ ¨ÉäÆ VÉÉä {ÉÉºÉ ÊnùB MÉB ½þèÆ, =xÉEòÉä ¤ÉÆnù Eò®ú ÊnùªÉÉ VÉÉB* =ºÉ¨ÉäÆ ªÉ½þ ½þÖ+É, ½þ¨ÉÉ®úä Ênù¨ÉÉMÉ ¨ÉäÆ xɽþÒÆ lÉÉ, ÊEò =ºÉEòä EòÉ®úhÉ ¦ÉÚiÉ{ÉÚ´ÉÇ ºÉÉÆºÉnù Ê´ÉÊE]õ¨É ½þÉä MÉB* VªÉÉäÆ ½þÒ ½þ¨ÉÉ®úÒ VÉÉxÉEòÉ®úÒ ¨ÉäÆ +ɪÉÉ, ¨ÉèÆxÉä =ºÉÒ ºÉ¨ÉªÉ VÉÉ®úÒ Eò®ú ÊnùªÉÉ* +ÉVÉ ¦ÉÒ Eò<Ç ºÉnùºªÉ Eò½þ ®ú½þä lÉä ÊEò ¦ÉÚiÉ{ÉÚ´ÉÇ ºÉÉÆºÉnùÉäÆ EòÉä ¤ÉÆnù Eò®ú ÊnùªÉÉ MɪÉÉ ½þè, ´É½þ ¤ÉÆnù xɽþÒÆ ÊEòªÉÉ*
SHRI PRAMOTHES MUKHERJEE (BERHAMPORE) (WB): Ex-MPs do not get reservation in Rajdhani Express Trains in their names.
SHRI RAM VILAS PASWAN (HAJIPUR):
¸ÉÒ ®úÉ¨É Ê´É±ÉÉºÉ {ÉɺɴÉÉxÉ: ´É½þ ¤ÉÉnù ¨ÉäÆ Eò®ú ±ÉäÆMÉä*
SHRI PRAMOTHES MUKHERJEE (BERHAMPORE) (WB): When he was a sitting MP, he was allowed.
SHRI RAM VILAS PASWAN (HAJIPUR):
¸ÉÒ ®úÉ¨É Ê´É±ÉÉºÉ {ÉɺɴÉÉxÉ: ´É½þ nùäJÉ ±ÉäÆMÉä* ¦ÉÚiÉ{ÉÚ´ÉÇ ºÉÉÆºÉnùÉäÆ EòÉä ®úÉVÉvÉÉxÉÒ +Éè®ú ¶ÉiÉɤnùÒ BEºÉ|ÉäºÉ ¨ÉäÆ ºÉ½þÚʱɪÉiÉäÆ Ê¨É±ÉiÉÒ lÉÒÆ, ¤ÉÉnù ¨ÉäÆ JÉi¨É Eò®ú nùÒ MÉ<ÇÆ, ±ÉäÊEòxÉ ´É½þ SÉɱÉÚ Eò®ú nùÒ MÉ<Ç ½þèÆ* ¤ÉÒSÉ ¨ÉäÆ BEò-nùÉä ÊnùxÉ EòÆ¡ªÉÚVÉxÉ Eòä EòÉ®úhÉ BäºÉÉ ½þÉä MɪÉÉ lÉÉ*
SHRI PRAMOTHES MUKHERJEE (BERHAMPORE) (WB): But please do something for the Ex-MPs in getting reservations in their names in Rajdhani and Shatabdi Express Trains.
SHRI RAM VILAS PASWAN (HAJIPUR):
¸ÉÒ ®úÉ¨É Ê´É±ÉÉºÉ {ÉɺɴÉÉxÉ: `öÒEò ½þè*
SHRI SURESH PRABHU (RAJAPUR): I thank the Railway Minister for immediately acceding to certain demands. Let me, Sir, first finish the Konkan Railway part of it.
There have been, as I mentioned, some stations on the Konkan Railway which have not been used and at the same time, there are some demands from some people to have some more railway stations because when it was planned and contemplated, certain areas were neglected. So, I request you to please undertake a survey. I will give the names of the stations which should be there and which should be covered by this. I request you to please take care of this.
I was reading the Annual Report of the Railways. There is a Railway Recruitment Board which undertakes recruitment to bring about a rationality and to make sure that no undue favour is done to anybody. I would request him to please form Regional Recruitment Board for the Konkan Railway because everything else is separate for this. Konkan Railway has all other systems; everything is functional autonomy there. So, this Regional Recruitment Board for the Konkan Railway is really necessary and I request the hon. Minister to concede to this demand also.
There is a Consultative Committee for various zones of the Railways. But there is no Consultative Committee for the Konkan Railways and so, the problems of the commuters, the problems of the people who travel by that and the problems pertaining to the Konkan Railway cannot really be redressed or addressed, otherwise. So, I request the hon. Railway Minister to please look into this.
As I just said, I am really proud to say that the Indian Railways are undertaking jobs all over the world. This is something which is really a cause of real celebration. We should really compliment the engineers and the people who are responsible for it. The Konkan Railway Corporation is a singular example of how it could be done in a record time, in a most difficult terrain which is not only known to India, but to the entire world. Why can we not use the expertise of the Konkan Railway Corporation to undertake projects elsewhere in the world, in difficult terrains, where probably this system can earn money for the Railways? We should not dismantle this Organisation which has been so superbly created.
One more word I want to say. I will be failing in my duty if I do not mention one thing about the Konkan Railway. Shri Sridharan who is the present Chairman of this Railway as well as his team of engineers and all those who have really made it possible should be falicitated in some form or the other by the people of India. It is time that we really record their services and their contributions. We award Padma Shrees and Padma Bhushans to several categories of people. Probably, one of those Awards should be given to them. There has to be some thanksgiving, for this wonderful feat that they have attained, by the people of India.
I want to mention another thing which is not coming under the Konkan Railway. It is a broader issue. We are embarking on a massive gauge conversion drive. During the year, probably we have done about 758 kms. of gauge conversion. When we do gauge conversion, the question which arises is this: when there are some railway facilities available in some form or the other, should we spend our energies, moneys and resources in converting that existing one into another type of gauge which may be the superior form. By doing that, we are really compromising and sacrificing the interests of other development and not laying adequate lines because funds are getting diverted into that.
Sir, it is time that we come out with a good policy about how gauge conversion should take place, what should be the trade-off between new rail development and gauge conversion, etc. You should really come out with a good concrete policy and this Government is committed to transparency. So, I think we should come out with a transparent policy on the basis of new railway lines to be started, matters like how we are reconciling to various demands from different parts of the country, how we are giving preference to one region, how we are going in for gauge conversion with reference to new lines are something which should be really debated and should be made as a part of the policy. This is what I feel.
About R&D exercise of the Railways, the hon. Minister has mentioned that various projects are already undertaken. My point is that some of the R&D projects are definitely meant for superior engineering in various parts of Railway operation. That is understandable and that is how it should also be. There is no R&D project undertaken on provision of passenger comforts, for the people who travel by trains to see what facilities could be offered to them to make them comfortable, etc. I request the hon. Railway Minister who really looks after the interest of the common man to undertake such a project so that when people travel by trains, they will find their life better than what it is now. So, R&D projects should also be undertaken with that kind of an objective.
There has been some improvement in the development of rolling stock of the Railways. We always say that rolling stock is now sufficient to cater to the demand existing in the country. But I find that there are several sectors which need improvement. You can see that coal accounts for a substantial portion of more than 60-65 per cent of the cargo handled by the Railways. But the non-coal component of cargo is really suffering because of non-availability of adequate rolling stock. So, it is time that we come out with a blue print for 10-15 years from now about the envisaged demand for the railway coaches and how we are going to cater to that. This is something which we should know.
The hon. Railway Minister must be complemented for Railways being the first organisation to come out last year with performance linked bonus. Because of that, all other sectors were also benefited. But in this Budget, I do not find any provision made for this bonus to be paid. Is it that the Government is not thinking of paying any performance linked bonus this time, or is it that they are going to come out with a supplementary budget, or mechanism, etc? Has the cargo handling taken place in a different way? Even at ports, we are really doing a lot of mechanisation to handle cargo. Are the Railways also going to handle cargo in a different way to make sure that the loss on account of thefts comes down significantly?
There are one or two points more. The fare structure also needs to be rationalised in the case of Mumbai. I will give the details to the hon. Minister.
The Rajasthan Tourism is surviving because of contribution by Indian Railways. He has mentioned in a Report in a very nice way as to how many tourists the Indian Railways handled. The handling of bulk cargo or handling of steel and coal, handling of passengers and handling of tourists is done by one single organisation. Are we not thinking of making subsidiaries for handling specialised type of passengers, like the tourists, so that the tourists could be properly catered to? The revenues of the Railways could increase and their specific needs could also be taken care of. The passengers travelling by suburban railways, the passengers travelling on trunk routes, the passengers travelling as tourists and the cargo cannot be treated at par. So, I think, there is a need to have some sort of a special subsidiary for handling the tourists as passengers. I hope, it will be done.
Out of the total land of 4.19 lakh hectare that the Railways possess 2,000 hectare have already been encroached upon. This 2,000 hectare of land, which has been encroached, is a big loss to the Railways. What steps are we taking to retrieve this land from the encroachers? 2,000 hectare of precious land and property have been encroached upon by the people. There is no mention about the steps that have been taken about it by the Railways.
Out of 4.19 lakh hectare of land, another 25,000 hectare of land is laying vacant. Probably, it is lying vacant for the encroachers to come and encroach. What steps are you taking to make sure that 25,000 hectare of land will also not be encroached upon like the 2,000 hectare which have already been encroached.
The condemned rolling-stock is of a very high quantity every year. Are we thinking that a part of this condemned railway stock could be reconditioned and sent to some of our friendly countries who would really benefit? Probably, this gesture would also be realised because we are hardly realising any significant amount out of this.
The productivity parameters have not been mentioned anywhere in the Budget. It is a time that we really come out with the figures. He also mentioned that our average annual wage has gone up from Rs. 45,709 in 1993-94 to Rs. 59,219 in just two years. It is a very good thing. We are really compensating the workers in an adequate manner. But has the productivity gone up in the Indian Railways during the same period? There is really a need to mention the per employee productivity as we are mentioning the per employee wage rate in the Railways.
Sir, the public relations, education and advertising campaign of the Railways have helped in creating a better image for the Railways. But as a part of the advertising campaign, is it really necessary to publish a full-fledged photograph of the Prime Minister all over the country when we are starting a railway line in one corner of the country or in Bihar? We really publish full-fledged advertisements all over the country and the cost incurred on that probably could be better utilized to offer better facilities to the commuters.
(ends)
MR. DEPUTY-SPEAKER : I suppose you have concluded.
SHRI SURESH PRABHU (RAJAPUR): Sir, if you say so.
MR. DEPUTY-SPEAKER: Thank you.
Now, the House stands adjourned to meet again tomorrow at 11 O'clock.
1801 hours
The Lok Sabha then adjourned till Eleven of the Clock on
Tuesday, March 11, 1997/Phalguna 20, 1918 (Saka).